From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 20 18:04:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D2916A41F for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:04:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexandre.delay@free.fr) Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD4E43D45 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:04:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexandre.delay@free.fr) Received: from Cerbere-de-Troyes.cerbere23.com (eur10-1-82-241-181-23.fbx.proxad.net [82.241.181.23]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406B052358; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:04:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from artemis ([192.168.2.2]) by Cerbere-de-Troyes.cerbere23.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with SMTP id jAKI4g9c038812; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:04:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from alexandre.delay@free.fr) From: "Alexandre DELAY" To: "Luigi Rizzo" Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:04:47 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20050629093248.A44168@xorpc.icir.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: RE: strange dummynet WFQ problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:04:51 -0000 It effectively works well, but I still have a problem: When I use my bandwidth (download a huge file) and I start a ping at the same time, latency grows from 15ms up to 300ms. Again my conf: > 00005 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00006 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00007 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext > 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 in via ext > 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any in via int > 65535 allow ip from any to any Cheers Alex -----Message d'origine----- De : owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org]De la part de Luigi Rizzo Envoye : mercredi 29 juin 2005 18:33 A : Alexandre D. Cc : freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Objet : Re: strange dummynet WFQ problem hi, when a pipe or queue has a mask of all 0's it only shows the addresses of the first packet that matched, so you don't have to worry about that. Also, if queues are linked to the pipe, the accounting is done on the queues and not on the pipe. cheers luigi On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:27:48PM +0200, Alexandre D. wrote: > > Hi guys > > I have a strange problem. > > here is a simple sample my conf (hic!): > > # ipfw list > 00005 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00006 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00007 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 00011 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ext > 21046 queue 8 ip from any to 172.20.1.23 > 21047 queue 9 ip from 172.20.1.23 to any > 65535 allow ip from any to any > > bash-2.05b# ipfw pipe list > 00001: 1.024 Mbit/s 0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > 00002: 1.024 Mbit/s 0 ms 50 sl. 0 queues (1 buckets) droptail > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > ... > q00008: weight 4 pipe 1 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte > Drp > 0 udp dns address/53 172.20.1.195/3007 1032 254524 0 0 > 0 > q00009: weight 4 pipe 2 50 sl. 1 queues (1 buckets) droptail > mask: 0x00 0x00000000/0x0000 -> 0x00000000/0x0000 > BKT Prot ___Source IP/port____ ____Dest. IP/port____ Tot_pkt/bytes Pkt/Byte > Drp > 0 udp 172.20.1.195/68 255.255.255.255/67 589 53330 0 0 > 0 > > > The thing is that: > -it looks that datas are going through the corrects queues, > -each queue is correctly linked to a pipe > -there is not accounting on both pipes > -only dns packets are shown by this command. > > > My wonders are: > -How can I be sure that my queues are correctly linked to the pipes? > -Why don't I have accounting on the pipes? > -Why don't I get other than dns packet accounting? > > Sorry for the english > > Thanks for the answer > > Cheers > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"