From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 16 22:34:21 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA84E1065672;
	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:34:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jilles@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CF28FC14;
	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:34:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0GMYLG6011009;
	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:34:21 GMT
	(envelope-from jilles@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from jilles@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0GMYLJO011004;
	Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:34:21 GMT (envelope-from jilles)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:34:21 GMT
Message-Id: <201101162234.p0GMYLJO011004@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: rmh@aybabtu.com, jilles@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
From: jilles@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: standards/92362: [headers] [patch] Missing SIGPOLL in kernel
	headers
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:34:21 -0000

Synopsis: [headers] [patch] Missing SIGPOLL in kernel headers

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: jilles
State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 16 22:33:04 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
Firstly, note that SIGPOLL is under the XSI option, which FreeBSD does
not attempt to implement completely. (In SUSv4, it's even Obsolescent
XSI STREAMS. We do not have STREAMS in FreeBSD.)

Secondly, I don't think our siginfo-less default-to-ignore SIGIO is
going to help a SIGPOLL-using program much.


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=92362