Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 07:58:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: "Thomas E. Zander" <riggs@rrr.de> Cc: FreeBSD amd64 mailing list <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs" Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411150746530.85716@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20041115070404.GP64152@marvin.riggiland.au> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0411130037360.85716@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20041115070404.GP64152@marvin.riggiland.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Thomas E. Zander wrote: Hi, > On Sat, 13. Nov 2004, at 0:47 +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote > according to [[PATCH] if_sk(4) rx/tx "hangs"]: > > > Any feedback appreciated. > > Unfortunately, it does not do the trick here (Asus P4P800SE, > Marvell 88E1000, RELENG_5), but it does something else :-) personal note: subsitute Marvell 88E1000 by PN from VPD data if available. > I don't see watchdog timeouts anymore; instead trying to fetch a large good :) > file (> 1MB) just hangs. It starts and after 500-900k the ftp client > doesn't receive further packets. not so good. > ssh doesn't like this patch at all. After typing some (say, 10) chars > into an ssh connection, the ssh client exits with > "Bad packet length <something huge>" what other patches did you apply ? could you please get the version from HEAD (should also work just fine with 5-STABLE) and tell me the results (including the additional dmesg lines but only the sk* parts). From the output I had already seen from you it seems we both have exactly the same chip so this is a bit strange. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0411150746530.85716>