Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:59:46 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Odhiambo Washington <wash@wananchi.com> Cc: FBSD-Q <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: [fwd] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-01:56.tcp_wrappers (from: security-advisories@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <20010824005946.B8330@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010824102533.E20953@ns2.wananchi.com>; from wash@wananchi.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:25:33AM %2B0300 References: <20010824102533.E20953@ns2.wananchi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:25:33AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I received this today. >=20 > My question is: >=20 > Why do we get the security notifications so much later than when the > correction was done?=20 > For those of use who do minitor the -cvs-all/ -stable and do UPDATEs on > almost a weekly basis, isn't this far much overtaken by events. > Someone cares to explain this to me? Why this late? Because a human is the one who writes the advisory. Sorry, but this job is a lot of work. Kris --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7hglxWry0BWjoQKURAnxrAKDinrVGaPaFcYlQmWMCisyiMvNTrwCghtfi Fpt59EzZMV2z4UaDeRB3xFQ= =Golz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8GpibOaaTibBMecb-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824005946.B8330>