From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 13 09:00:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360C824F; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from fep21.mx.upcmail.net (fep21.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB68F10DD; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep21-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20130613085537.SKEN1449.viefep21-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:55:37 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.84.132.32]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id nkvb1l03y0i5fp603kvb2u; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:55:36 +0200 X-SourceIP: 178.84.132.32 Message-ID: <51B98907.8090005@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:55:35 +0200 From: Koop Mast User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: svn commit: r320737 - head/Mk References: <201306130643.r5D6h8wP033990@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201306130643.r5D6h8wP033990@svn.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130612-1, 12-06-2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:00:11 -0000 On 13-6-2013 8:43, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Author: bapt > Date: Thu Jun 13 06:43:08 2013 > New Revision: 320737 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/320737 > > Log: > Fix make patch not stopping in case a patch does not apply cleanly with bmake. > bmake does not run shell with set -e causing the difference between both fmake and bmake in the area. > > Thanks!