Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 13:15:17 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there any modern alternative to pstack? Message-ID: <20120404171517.GA1886@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxg=ZO7Rtep%2BvLaa%2BBrQyiPOhU_96V_Uy9nuy6BjoS4tHqQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F775DF5.1020704@rawbw.com> <201204020831.09253.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F79D63E.7010200@rawbw.com> <201204021312.36568.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F7BDF06.8000104@freebsd.org> <CAF6rxg=ZO7Rtep%2BvLaa%2BBrQyiPOhU_96V_Uy9nuy6BjoS4tHqQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
There are plenty of patches in the ports tree. At which point do you call it maintaining within the ports tree ? 8 files changed, 796 insertions(+), 233 deletions(-) Is hardly what someone should call maintaining considering the size of some of the other patches. And besides someone was willing to contribute the patch... no sense in degrading their work if they were willing to put it up for consumption. On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:44:31AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 4 April 2012 01:41, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > should be in ports? > > Not unless someone decides to become the new upstream and make a > release. We do not maintain software in ports. > > -- > Eitan Adler > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- ;s =;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120404171517.GA1886>