Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 13:57:05 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interrupt latency problems Message-ID: <20030511135005.W74110@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <41DA5B37-8330-11D7-9B15-0003937E39E0@mac.com> References: <41DA5B37-8330-11D7-9B15-0003937E39E0@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 10 May 2003, David Leimbach wrote: > Sorry for being possibly redundant but I think you *must* use sysmouse > to get rid of > the latency issues. I was arguing with the KDE developers for a while I never use it, and have no latency problems large enough to affect interactivity :-), though I have diagnostics that detect many problems just below the interactivity threshold. MUTEX_PROFILING might be enough to debug Giant lock latency. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030511135005.W74110>