Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:20:37 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Jim Flowers <jflowers@peony.ezo.net>
To:        Stephen Hocking <shocking@houston.rr.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Running natd on more than one interface...
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009200818450.48594-100000@peony.ezo.net>
In-Reply-To: <200009200242.e8K2gnG03719@bloop.craftncomp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes.  Just use a separate process for each with different ports for the
divert.  This is useful inbound when you want the source of an external
connection to have a local address.

Jim Flowers <jflowers@ezo.net>
#4 ranked ISP on C|NET #1 in Ohio

On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote:

> 
> I have a home network that talks to the world-at-large using natd to do the 
> address translation on my gateway machine. However, I've just started 
> tunneling (over an encrypted link) to another place using the tun interface. 
> I'd like to have it translated as well. Has anyone tried running natd on more 
> than one interface?
> 
> 
> 
> 	Stephen
> -- 
>   The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
> 
>     "We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
>      the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
>      this is not true."            Robert Wilensky, University of California
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009200818450.48594-100000>