From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Sep 20 5: 5:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from peony.ezo.net (peony.ezo.net [206.102.130.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCA737B423 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 05:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jflowers@localhost) by peony.ezo.net (8.11.0.Beta3/8.11.0.Beta3) with ESMTP id e8KCKbP48664; Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:20:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:20:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Flowers To: Stephen Hocking Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Running natd on more than one interface... In-Reply-To: <200009200242.e8K2gnG03719@bloop.craftncomp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes. Just use a separate process for each with different ports for the divert. This is useful inbound when you want the source of an external connection to have a local address. Jim Flowers #4 ranked ISP on C|NET #1 in Ohio On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote: > > I have a home network that talks to the world-at-large using natd to do the > address translation on my gateway machine. However, I've just started > tunneling (over an encrypted link) to another place using the tun interface. > I'd like to have it translated as well. Has anyone tried running natd on more > than one interface? > > > > Stephen > -- > The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor. > > "We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce > the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know > this is not true." Robert Wilensky, University of California > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message