Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:23:57 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: mmokhi@freebsd.org, koobs@freebsd.org Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r442220 - in head/sysutils: . py-gmailfs-fuse Message-ID: <0cc4b2f8-808c-fdd8-2658-51a5f9ed68fe@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAN9adSNGqpLOAQJBAyhxWyFoC5rnRj2tRuBE_3wRMYojy0f4mQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201705311520.v4VFKGdW094883@repo.freebsd.org> <CAMHz58SSayA4pr_2iBKa_%2B%2B45ZdS=WXEO%2BExVO=Gisao7xo=Sw@mail.gmail.com> <706c5d72-1257-0041-26e6-542cd439099e@FreeBSD.org> <CAN9adSNGqpLOAQJBAyhxWyFoC5rnRj2tRuBE_3wRMYojy0f4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--aIn3fNNp16AH0LLGwavw3xnCSBuce4ISb
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MMKHQxcweLxkvkKjqA9LE0qpGE4h5UuOx";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To: mmokhi@freebsd.org, koobs@freebsd.org
Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@freebsd.org>,
ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <0cc4b2f8-808c-fdd8-2658-51a5f9ed68fe@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r442220 - in head/sysutils: . py-gmailfs-fuse
References: <201705311520.v4VFKGdW094883@repo.freebsd.org>
<CAMHz58SSayA4pr_2iBKa_++45ZdS=WXEO+ExVO=Gisao7xo=Sw@mail.gmail.com>
<706c5d72-1257-0041-26e6-542cd439099e@FreeBSD.org>
<CAN9adSNGqpLOAQJBAyhxWyFoC5rnRj2tRuBE_3wRMYojy0f4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN9adSNGqpLOAQJBAyhxWyFoC5rnRj2tRuBE_3wRMYojy0f4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
--MMKHQxcweLxkvkKjqA9LE0qpGE4h5UuOx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: fr
Le 01/06/2017 =C3=A0 10:42, Mahdi Mokhtari a =C3=A9crit :
> > Might be a good time to change fusefs from an arbitrary port/pkg name=
> > prefix not accurately reflecting upstream names and use a virtual
> > category instead.
>
> > I'm planning to do this for all Python django ports too, as their nam=
es
> > don't match their upstream counterparts as users expect or when they'=
re
> > searching.
>
> Ok, it seems good idea to me :-)
> Should we start adding it ("fusefs" or "fuse") to Mk/* then adding it
> to CATEGORIES of fuse ports?
You should start by reading the documentation. It is always a good place
to start.
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/article.html#por=
ts-qa-new-category
--=20
Mathieu Arnold
--MMKHQxcweLxkvkKjqA9LE0qpGE4h5UuOx--
--aIn3fNNp16AH0LLGwavw3xnCSBuce4ISb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=Iztb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aIn3fNNp16AH0LLGwavw3xnCSBuce4ISb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0cc4b2f8-808c-fdd8-2658-51a5f9ed68fe>