From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct  7 19:04:54 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73C016A41F;
	Fri,  7 Oct 2005 19:04:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from postal4.es.net (postal4.es.net [198.124.252.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C13243D48;
	Fri,  7 Oct 2005 19:04:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29])
	by postal4.es.net (Postal Node 4) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465;
	Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:04:49 -0700
Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 81D1D5D0A;
	Fri,  7 Oct 2005 12:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:49:41 +0900."
	<ygeek6xtb5m.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> 
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:04:47 -0700
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Message-Id: <20051007190447.81D1D5D0A@ptavv.es.net>
Cc: Marcin Jessa <lists@yazzy.org>, AT Matik <asstec@matik.com.br>,
	freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.4-REL/KDE3.4 && notebook battery/temperature 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD <freebsd-mobile.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile>,
	<mailto:freebsd-mobile-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 19:04:54 -0000

> Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:49:41 +0900
> From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>>>> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 08:23:19 -0700
> >>>>> "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> said:
> 
> oberman> No. You need apm_enable even if you are using ACPI. Most of the battery
> oberman> tools use the apm interface which may be emulated with ACPI. This
> oberman> requires apm_enable="yes" even if you are not actually using APM.
> 
> No, you don't need apm_enable="yes" to use APM sim with ACPI.  You can
> see battery status in an output of the apm(8) even when APM Management
> is Disabled.  The apm(8) doesn't use an API of ACPI but uses an API of
> APM.

Sorry for the mis-information. I remember having to add apm_enable to my
system. I just forgot why. (I think it was for zzz to work.)

Thanks for correcting this.
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634