Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:54:24 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Denis Borisov <denb@front.ru>
Cc:        ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: When will implemented in-kernel NAT?
Message-ID:  <20030817085424.GA49865@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <200308121426.11858.denb@front.ru>
References:  <200308121426.11858.denb@front.ru>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:26:11PM +0400, Denis Borisov wrote:
> In comments in file ip_fw2.c i read:=20
> * Dynamic rules can be used for different purposes:
>  *  + stateful rules;
>  *  + enforcing limits on the number of sessions;
>  *  + in-kernel NAT (not implemented yet)
>=20
> When will implemented in-kernel NAT?

Don't know about ipfw, but ipfilter apparently supports it (man ipnat).

Kris

--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/P0K/Wry0BWjoQKURAvuyAJ4gXsKkwKQnLTQQzJUHuX9DNIud8QCdGPec
heHuajd4JufYUcyRJYp/5/Q=
=y+G4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030817085424.GA49865>