Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:39:46 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: a.degroot@science.ru.nl Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A cvsup without libm.so.2 ? Message-ID: <20041231003946.GB29434@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0412301302270.9139-100000@odin.cs.kun.nl> References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0412301302270.9139-100000@odin.cs.kun.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 01:15:34PM +0100, a.degroot@science.ru.nl wrote: > I'm updating some desktop machines here that went through the 5.3-BETA > phase and hence have a libm.so.2 as well as a libm.so.3. Since there's no > real reason to have a libm.so.2 (is there?), I'm trying to get rid of all > references to it [1]. portupgrade -af mostly does the job, but I'm sort of > stuck with cvsup. It's still binary-only, isn't it? The current packages > of cvsup still link to libm.so.2, which is somewhat annoying. In > particular, clean installs of 5.3 can't run cvsup. Can we get a > libm.so.2-free cvsup sometime? You may easily need libm.so.2 for running other 5.3 binaries on 6-CURRENT. I would move libm.so.2 to /usr/lib/compat and keep on running the cvsup you have now. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041231003946.GB29434>