Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 11:32:28 +0000 From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org> To: dmaddox@scsn.net Cc: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>, Johan Granlund <johang@mail.algonet.se>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppp and ascend router problems Message-ID: <199711131132.LAA11863@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Nov 1997 21:15:41 EST." <19971112211541.08486@scsn.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Nov 13, 1997 at 01:05:23AM +0000, Brian Somers wrote:
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: HDLC: 00 00 03 04
> > > c0 23 07 02 08 02 13 09 03 00 c0 7b
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: HDLC: 5f d3 10 50 aa
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: LCP: Received Configure Request (1)
> > > state =Req-Sent (6)
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: LCP: MRU 1524
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: LCP: ACCMAP 000a0000
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: LCP: AUTHPROTO proto = c023
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: LCP: PROTOCOMP
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: LCP: ACFCOMP
> > > Nov 12 22:35:05 phoenix ppp[621]: tun0: LCP: ???[13]
> >
> > The peer has just violated the ppp protocol by asking for a [13]
> > again :-(
>
> I get this sequence from my ISP, too... The 13 bytes that PPP doesn't
> seem to like appear to be an attempt to negotiate STAC compression, when
> you look at the actual contents of the packets.
There's nothing wrong with anyone sending this once, but after ppp
has rejected the ConfigReq on this basis, it's illegal for the peer
to ask for it again.
--
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>, <brian@FreeBSD.org>, <bri@OpenBSD.org>
<http://www.Awfulhak.org>;
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711131132.LAA11863>