Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:07:15 -0700
From:      Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>
To:        Chris <racerx@makeworld.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 5.3-Beta1: So far, so goo. Day 5.
Message-ID:  <20040826000715.GD89034@thought.org>
In-Reply-To: <412D10E7.8020704@makeworld.com>
References:  <412D10E7.8020704@makeworld.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

	Hi Chris, and howdy rest-of-list,


On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:21:27PM -0500, Chris wrote:
> Well - this is my 5th day using 5.3-Beta1 (sup'ing from 5.2.1-p9)
> I removed the debuging code in the kernel - runs well for a Beta.


	Brave man... .

	I think I'll wait awhile before upgrading to RELENG_5.
	But Q1:  how exactly, does one get rid of the debugging stuff?
	And Q2, now that we've got gcc-3.4, would it help to use a higher
	opyimization? say, "-O3"?   ....

> 
> Since I use KDE, I did notice that Kgpg (whatever it is) is non 
> functional. S'ok tho - I dont use Kmail so to me that's not an issue.
> 
> Everything from an day-to-day basis runs. Nothing seems to have been 
> broken that I found.
> 
> This is my production PC at home, so it's being used constantly.
> 
> I'm unsure where to post this, so I sent to Questions and Current.
> 

	I've got two 400MHz platforms, so I want to be able to max'z
	the systems. System tuningg obviously helps, and hopefully
	the new compiler will help too.

	cheers,

	gary

-- 
   Gary Kline     kline@thought.org   www.thought.org     Public service Unix



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040826000715.GD89034>