From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 10:17:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF91065672; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68278FC1C; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QsXlL-0001xl-SV>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:17:47 +0200 Received: from e178037016.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.37.16] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1QsXlL-0002Kd-Oz>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:17:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4E47A0CB.6090002@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:17:47 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110712 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Niclas Zeising References: <4E454ADD.1020201@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812171611.GA88850@slackbox.erewhon.net> <20110812182108.GA90173@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E457477.4060400@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110812205408.GA9873@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E45ACA8.5070406@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813072642.GA24239@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E462D0D.8070901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110813100810.GA27193@slackbox.erewhon.net> <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E4799D4.8000703@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.37.16 Cc: Olivier Smedts , Roland Smith , FreeBSD Current , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 10:17:50 -0000 On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>> On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: >>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>>> On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >>>>>>>>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz >>>> Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the >>>> permissions et cetera OK? >>>> >>>> Roland >>> No, it does not. >>> >>> What I did so far over night: >>> >>> I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. >>> Again failure. >>> After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). >>> Everything seems >>> all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a >>> non-portsnap-created /usr/ports >>> and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very >>> same failure: >>> >>> (portsnap fetch extract:) >>> /usr/ports/devel/cccc/ >>> /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ >>> /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ >>> /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ >>> files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not >>> found -- snapshot corrupt. >> I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated >> by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a >> file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO >> >> 1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?) >> 2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto) >> 3) tar (ditto) >> >> When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with >> tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz' >> in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an >> 8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug! >> >> Roland > Just a "me too!". It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current > virtual machine, built with clang. > Regards! Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD 9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected. I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated gcc 4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present. By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG. Oliver