From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 15:58:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68818106566B for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [78.110.53.255]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134D88FC1A for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F0118FC51 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:58:07 +0300 (MSK) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (drsun1.dialup.corbina.ru [85.21.245.235]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D30688FC18; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:58:04 +0300 (MSK) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A4B03996C; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:58:06 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:58:01 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Robert Watson Message-Id: <20090117185801.fcce79e9.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <200901161547.n0GFlZ4C012008@svn.freebsd.org> <20090117142021.92d5a40b.stas@FreeBSD.org> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted X-DSPAM-Processed: Sat Jan 17 18:58:07 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 9809 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 4972000f967001470720348 Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ed Schouten Subject: Re: svn commit: r187332 - head/tools/regression/usr.bin/jot X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:58:21 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Robert Watson mentioned: > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > > Was this discussed somewhere? I don't understand why we should restrict our > > filesystem naming because of limitation of auxilary filesystems. There're > > even more restrictive filesystems available, we couldn't support them all. > > While previous modifications looked harmless this one seems questionable to > > me. > > > > I understand, this is a bikesched, but I really don't see a reason. You > > can't build FreeBSD on windows anyway. > > Many of us would *very* much like to be able to cross-build FreeBSD from both > Windows and Mac OS X, which would be highly desirable for embedded systems and > appliance shops. The first obstacle to making that work is that you can't > even check out our source code correctly on those platforms, so fixing that is > an important priority so that the remainder can be worked on. > I think this should be rather worked out in these platforms themselves (e.g. by renaming files in the checkout files, and so on) withouth trashing our tree. While some changes could be understandable, the one I've replied completely broked heirarchy of jot regressions tests: before the names of files were coreesponding to the options used in the test, now you can't say exactly what options used by looking at the filename. This looks like a gratitous change and regression to me. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAklyAA4ACgkQK/VZk+smlYEY+gCdH99dsZT2acDJl6jgdp16ht2J 94wAn1sMkHUbi+oglF2wlVhoPnCbsuuA =LWcn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:4972000f967001470720348!