Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:04:50 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@freebsd.org> To: adamw@freebsd.org Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UPDATING ports/print/teTeX-base Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/print/teTeX-base/files patch-CAN-2004-0888 patch-CAN-2004-1125 patch-CAN-2005-0064 patch-texk::kpathsea::Makefile.in patch-texk::kpathsea::texmf.in patch-texk::tetex::updmap ... Message-ID: <20050207.020450.107295906.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <42064B3F.6040309@FreeBSD.org> References: <200502061352.j16Dqxtg017764@repoman.freebsd.org> <42064B3F.6040309@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Feb__7_02_04_50_2005_850)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <42064B3F.6040309@FreeBSD.org>: a> Hiroki Sato wrote: a> > Log: a> > Update to 2.99.13.20040204, a teTeX-3.0 release candidate. a> ^^^^ a> a> Are these dates really correct? Why are we just now upgrading to a a> year-old teTeX distro? Grr, no, 2.99.13.20050204 is correct. The version numbers in the Makefiles should be correct, too. Sorry for the confusion. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Feb__7_02_04_50_2005_850)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCBk4yTyzT2CeTzy0RAv6zAKCspxYyH13nNXIsim/+7urN/6qWjgCgs57P 0CJbHurN88x+T9Mf2/ge5bg= =2ZcF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Feb__7_02_04_50_2005_850)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050207.020450.107295906.hrs>