Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:23:43 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        raj@semihalf.com
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ARM interrupts fixes
Message-ID:  <20080904.102343.-1543903392.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <48C0092F.3030308@semihalf.com>
References:  <48BFE533.7010602@semihalf.com> <20080904200232.a8b556c9.stas@FreeBSD.org> <48C0092F.3030308@semihalf.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <48C0092F.3030308@semihalf.com>
            Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> writes:
: Stanislav Sedov wrote:
: > The patch looks goot to me. But what about splitting the whitespace
: > fixes and the meaningful ones when committing to the tree to not
: > pollute the history?
: 
: I can do it, but was under the impression that white space fix-only commits
: were rather frowned upon, isn't it the case any longer?

White space only commits for the sake of fixing white space only is
frowned on.  If you are in there doing other things, they are OK.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080904.102343.-1543903392.imp>