Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:26:03 +0100
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@FreeBSD.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/unzip Makefile unzip.1 unzip.c
Message-ID:  <478BC55B.2060202@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080114181154.GA2286@dragon.NUXI.org>
References:  <200801080800.m08806jI012963@repoman.freebsd.org> <478A8FFE.8080602@freebsd.org> <478A95F2.1070709@FreeBSD.org> <478AA9E4.2010807@kientzle.com> <478ABC4B.8080601@FreeBSD.org> <20080114181154.GA2286@dragon.NUXI.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:

>> If we have to special case ports to deal with variant zipfiles that cannot 
>> be processed by /usr/bin/unzip then it gets messier because we have to 
>> account for some ports being satisfied with USE_ZIP=yes meaning 
>> /usr/bin/unzip and some still requiring /usr/ports/archivers/unzip.  I'd 
>> prefer not to have to add those workarounds.
> 
> This seems quite easy...
> 
> For those four-ish ports 's/USE_ZIP/USE_INFOZIP/'

That's what I meant by "special case".  I don't like adding special case 
variables to bsd.*.mk for the benefit of a tiny number of ports; that 
file is already cluttered enough.

Kris




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?478BC55B.2060202>