Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 17:07:38 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Increasing the size of dev_t and ino_t Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020312170609.4664M-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <26044.1015970449@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > You know, I find it rather theoretical what to do with the udev_t > if(&when) it gets expanded to 64 bits, in particular considering that we > appearntly have no active maintenance of AFS in FreeBSD at all... That's actually not quite the case. The KTH Arla project actively maintains Arla for FreeBSD, but they do so against the -STABLE branch. I ran Arla for several years, I just don't live in an AFS-centric environment anymore. This is quite similar for KTH's support for Kerberos. Also, there has been an active porting project to bring OpenAFS to FreeBSD. Chasing -CURRENT and our VFS is just difficult :-). Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020312170609.4664M-100000>