From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 27 18:12:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:12:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390E643D6A for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:12:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl) Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018) id D16CA3474C2; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:10:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:10:38 +0200 From: Pawel Malachowski To: Dmitry Karasik Message-ID: <20040827181038.GA75620@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> References: <84zn4g7go5.fsf_-_@plab.ku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <84zn4g7go5.fsf_-_@plab.ku.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: shared memory in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:12:20 -0000 On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:18:50PM +0200, Dmitry Karasik wrote: > I've been playing with shared memory in jails, and very soon found > out that one jail's segments are visible (didn't check the accesibility > thoroughly) in another, which IMO is against the very idea of the jail. kern/48471 -- Paweł Małachowski