Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 00:52:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: html-editor Message-ID: <14759.23317.421433.838582@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <103434981@toto.iv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kent Stewart writes: > FWIW, I test from a different computer in both IE and NN mode because > of the vast differences in capabilities. The most common but different > feature I've seen is how they treat tables. The capabilities are not > comparable. I also stay away from the unique features. Note that IE & NN are *very* similar browsers. IE was developed from the NCSA Mosaic code, and NN was initially designed to be bug-for-bug compatible with NCSA Mosaic. But they've had sufficiently different sets of bugs that you really do need to test in both of them. You should also test in a browser whose design goal is to follow the standard: I'd recommend /usr/ports/www/amaya. It also does a WYSISKWYG (that's What You See is Sorta-Kinda What You Get) HTML editor. Finally, testing in LUI browser (w3m or lynx; both in the ports) to make sure you didn't accidently shut out users who like fast browsers. <mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14759.23317.421433.838582>