From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Tue Feb 12 04:22:03 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9BD14D4ABA
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2C86ECF4
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:22:02 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@freebsd.org>)
 id 1gtPa2-000P0a-Av; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:21:58 +0100
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:21:58 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bug report commit request
Message-ID: <20190212042158.GJ2748@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20190211091032.GH2748@home.opsec.eu>
 <20190211.183945.1315873006023602929.yasu@utahime.org>
 <20190211094449.GI2748@home.opsec.eu>
 <20190211.191709.469233083199067332.yasu@utahime.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190211.191709.469233083199067332.yasu@utahime.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 04:22:03 -0000

Hi!

> >> > What about the LICENSE=NONE setting ? It stops the port from being build in poudriere ?

> > So, does it sound sensible to define a LICENSE that one has to special-case
> > immediatly just to do a test-build ? I mean, don't we all have better things
> > to do than shooting ourselves in the feet ?
> 
> There is really no license information about this software. So
> according to license framework of FreeBSD ports there isn't anything
> wrong about adding 'LICENSE=NONE' in Makefile of this port.

The same is true for not adding a LICENSE line in this case.

>  And if it
> is really problematic then what should be fixed is license framework
> itself or behavior of poudriere about it rather than license
> information of this port. Ad-hocism doesn't pay in the long run.

There is no other LICENSE=NONE instance in the ports tree.

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                    One year to go !