From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 13 02:34:02 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04357132
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:34:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from a27-116.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com
 (a27-116.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com [54.240.27.116])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D018CD92
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:34:01 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
 s=hsbnp7p3ensaochzwyq5wwmceodymuwv; d=amazonses.com; t=1415844969;
 h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID;
 bh=2NABV/5IT9NE6kcbdJOx9iZ6OPmOPFHw4R1GQZT7ijM=;
 b=CqPb+QabUsW17ZGUz64UPUruc8HYLLJ5Qy40kD5i5RVaH7muifVzUk4FNjs0YGtw
 wcOdf8TZ/XGmQnep7mNG70VP8Ggy1WcFhZ3DlWlPlr5yHtpGm+FOfr0BnxhoFy4BVBh
 j4rVZmVfHR53rN0I5MvOz0Mo4tjbKqR/nvHUnGsY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
 s=7iuvfuckmdjngkit3px46zmjutqvp75o; d=vmeta.jp; t=1415844969;
 h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID;
 bh=2NABV/5IT9NE6kcbdJOx9iZ6OPmOPFHw4R1GQZT7ijM=;
 b=XqwHr6HnTAbnXVFOVF+iVCqXH/NwPQumDie/oj6GoHfBt1mwAsNMNJOTwk6H0Xtd
 X4STcZFZyjbFeD0CWqHZ/CtW+wFEJw3OofXsJikhAJgRUTEjKbi1mCosbWusL09ueGA
 MeHqaRQCwBsSAndXe/AtGYE9sLi7gQcuxyCtFD0o=
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on glory.vmeta.jp
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:16:09 +0000
From: Koichiro IWAO <meta@vmeta.jp>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: question about PORTVERSIONing
Message-ID: <00000149a6efbad6-83c03324-44b9-4858-b787-e65a63cd590e-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
X-Sender: meta@vmeta.jp
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.3
X-SES-Outgoing: 2014.11.13-54.240.27.116
Feedback-ID: us-west-2.bWV0YUB2bWV0YS5qcA==:AmazonSES
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 02:34:02 -0000

Hi,

I have a question about determining PORTVERSION.

I was told to correct PORTVERSION 0.0.yyyy.mm.dd style [1] by a 
committer.
devel/ruby-build port now has yyyymmdd style PORTVERSION like 20141028 
and
yyyymmdd is the upstream's official versioning system.  I'm not using 
date
instead of version number since upstream has no version information but
just using through upstream version to PORTVERSION.

Do I have to use 0.0.yyyy.mm.dd in such case?

[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194646

-- 
`whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w`
meta <meta@vmeta.jp>