From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Mar 28 2:33:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBAF37B832 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 02:33:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16664 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:33:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id MAA18668; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:32:05 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: amazon email response References: <20000328115433.A11980@cons.org> From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: Martin Cracauer's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:54:33 +0200" Date: 28 Mar 2000 12:32:05 +0200 Message-ID: <0vu2hrqtay.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Martin Cracauer writes: > The facts so far don't contradict their claim that they use their > patent only against B&N and that B&N is in fact worth fighting Why do you think is that? Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message