Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:26:39 +0100
From:      "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>
To:        "Ben Eisenbraun" <bene@klatsch.org>
Cc:        <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Lockdown of FreeBSD machine directly on Net
Message-ID:  <012101c16391$3f31ca80$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
References:  <15330.23714.263323.466739@guru.mired.org> <00b501c1637b$1cd2f880$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20011102095554.A38169@student.uu.se> <00d801c1637c$d3264640$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20011102055416.B67495@klatsch.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ben writes:

> in /etc/ssh/sshd_config is the line:
>
> PermitRootLogin no
>
> change that to yes, HUP sshd,  and it will allow root
> to login directly via ssh.

I had already done that, but I think I found the problem: I was excluding group
wheel in login.access.  It works now.

> NOT RECOMMENDED.

What is the risk of ssh?  It doesn't even use a password, much less send one in
the clear.  If you don't have a valid private key, you can't get in.  I can see
why telnet would be a risk, with passwords moving in the clear, and the relative
ease of trying to guess passwords, but neither of these apply to ssh, as far as
I know.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?012101c16391$3f31ca80$0a00000a>