From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 19 13:14:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ECA16A49E; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D3143D77; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:14:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.138] (helo=anti-virus01-09) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FsJZp-0000xu-4I; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:14:01 +0100 Received: from [82.41.34.175] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FsJZm-0006Yk-Hh; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4496A315.4020504@dial.pipex.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:13:57 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060515 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au References: <200606191251.k5JCpo7Y054704@app.auscert.org.au> In-Reply-To: <200606191251.k5JCpo7Y054704@app.auscert.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade confusing '-P' and '-p'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:14:11 -0000 freebsd-questions@auscert.org.au wrote: >Note from the above that portinstall is presuming that -PP was used and >is not building the port. I can omit the '-p' and this stops the occurrence >of this error, but then I don't get a package creation and that means I'll >have to build this port from scratch every time I want to install it. I >could force package creation of all ports, but this seems wasteful when >only a few require this process. Is this a bug in portupgrade, or have I >just used a conflicting array of arguments? > > Don't know why what you are doing doesn't work, but you can create the package afterwards with pkg_create. So no, you won't have to build it every time. --Alex