From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 9 03:00:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B73F16A407 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 03:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC9343D49 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 03:00:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k89307E8006684; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 04:00:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=softfail; spf=softfail X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk k89307E8006684 Message-ID: <45022E30.4020905@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 04:00:00 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Langille References: <4501DE34.25561.1AFD75D6@dan.langille.org> In-Reply-To: <4501DE34.25561.1AFD75D6@dan.langille.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig011FE51D0B17CC11C923CAB5" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 09 Sep 2006 04:00:27 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1829/Sat Sep 9 02:23:06 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_TESTING, NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 (2006-08-29) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: FreeBSD not popular in Asia? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:00:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig011FE51D0B17CC11C923CAB5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan Langille wrote: > On 8 Sep 2006 at 22:02, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >=20 >> Check out http://www.bsdstats.org ... Republic of Korea is about to pu= sh=20 >> the US out of first place, but there are *zero* FreeBSD boxes reportin= g=20 >> from there ... DragonFly is first, then NetBSD and then OpenBSD ... >> >> Are there *really* no Korean FreeBSD hosts out there ... ? >=20 > Correct. There are no Korean FreeBSD hosts out there... that have=20 > signed up. >=20 > I have about 8 or 10 boxes, I've signed up only one. No particular=20 > reason. Reported hosts for China and India are following the same pattern. About= equal numbers of Open/Net/DFly and very few Free. Either there's some fairly large scale project in those countries using hundreds of those systems, or someone is playing games. It would be interesting to see the= reported devices for those machines, if any. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig011FE51D0B17CC11C923CAB5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFAi438Mjk52CukIwRCPzcAJ95NbJiE8ycO6MNox7/Yw7vC5Hx2QCdF2bS 8goCjW2HnpQUw+vxT0/ROCE= =vZDu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig011FE51D0B17CC11C923CAB5--