From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 23:54:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134361065677 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:54:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9C28FC08 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6FNs5Hi083591; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:54:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6FNs5bL083590; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:54:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:54:05 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Nate Lawson Message-ID: <20080715235405.GA83380@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20080715222449.GA82931@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <487D24EC.30900@root.org> <20080715223638.GB82931@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <487D2C87.3020209@root.org> <20080715231401.GA83158@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <487D307E.5020501@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <487D307E.5020501@root.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of acpi is supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:54:06 -0000 On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 04:19:26PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 04:02:31PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > >>Are you loading cpufreq? > >> > > > >No. > > It might be that your BIOS requires you to have cpufreq if you ask it > for acpi v2+. > Okay, I rebuilt my kernel (I don't use modules) and reset the BIOS to version 3. I'll see if the test node shuts itself down. Thanks for your input. -- Steve