Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:59:55 +0300 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Checksum mismatch for ports/finance/homebank-4.2 Message-ID: <4B844FDB.5040205@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <4B844421.1020302@FreeBSD.org> References: <20100214124647.686e22e2@smtp.mail.yahoo.co.uk> <4B786AF1.2090803@FreeBSD.org> <4B78717C.9070901@yandex.ru> <4B78721D.7030209@FreeBSD.org> <4B838F6B.3000306@yandex.ru> <4B844421.1020302@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24.02.2010 00:09, Doug Barton wrote: > On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled: >>> >>> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the >>> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs. >>> >>> >>> Doug >>> >> >> So is there any news about this? >> The port is now marked as broken in ports tree. > > I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one > that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has. Yes, i see. So what we should now do, are we have to wait for next HomeBank release? ). I'm just afraid that this port will not go into 7.3 packages because of this situation with rerolling. PS. I'm using it (installed with changed distinfo) more than a week, and it's fine to me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B844FDB.5040205>