From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed May 24 17:45:54 1995 Return-Path: hardware-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA29540 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 24 May 1995 17:45:54 -0700 Received: from hutcs.cs.hut.fi (root@hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA29532 for ; Wed, 24 May 1995 17:45:51 -0700 Received: from shadows.cs.hut.fi by hutcs.cs.hut.fi with SMTP id AA05530 (5.65c8/HUTCS-S 1.4 for ); Thu, 25 May 1995 03:45:44 +0300 From: Heikki Suonsivu Received: (hsu@localhost) by shadows.cs.hut.fi (8.6.10/8.6.10) id DAA09610; Thu, 25 May 1995 03:45:42 +0300 Date: Thu, 25 May 1995 03:45:42 +0300 Message-Id: <199505250045.DAA09610@shadows.cs.hut.fi> To: uc@brian.lunetix.de (Ulrich Callmeier) Cc: freebsd-hardware@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: uc@brian.lunetix.de's message of 25 May 1995 03:13:48 +0300 Subject: Re: Proposed p90 hardware configuration Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Otaniemi, Finland Sender: hardware-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk uc@brian.lunetix.de (Ulrich Callmeier) writes: you got all the components on one chip. Even Dirk Hohndel from XFree86 core team recommended this chipset as the one making fewest trouble, because you don't have the problem of varying RAMDACS, clockchips etc. Ditto here, it seems to be a bargain, 2M card, easy installation, does 32bpp, and seemed reasonably fast. We didn't get 1280x1024 interlaced mode working quite right. We can get it working alone but switching back to any other mode messes up the screen, it doesn't seem to be returning the modes correctly. Other modes seem to work fine. The card would do 135MHz but the monitor doesn't so I haven't tried it out. -- Heikki Suonsivu, T{ysikuu 10 C 83/02210 Espoo/FINLAND, hsu@cs.hut.fi home +358-0-8031121 work -4513377 fax -4555276 riippu SN