From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 09:01:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B43106566B; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from cp-out8.libero.it (cp-out8.libero.it [212.52.84.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BD38FC08; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:01:01 +0000 (UTC) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0209.4E536C4C.00DA,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1555 Received: from soth.ventu (151.41.231.50) by cp-out8.libero.it (8.5.133) id 4E301F1503203A97; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:01:00 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7N90mpK072997; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:00:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4E536C40.8080305@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:00:48 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110817 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <4E5105A4.1060706@netfence.it> <20110823005850.a60d433e.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110823005850.a60d433e.stas@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.1.2.13 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade of portupgrade to 2.4.9,2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:01:02 -0000 On 08/23/11 09:58, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:18:28 +0200 > Andrea Venturoli mentioned: > >> On 08/21/11 08:26, n dhert wrote: >>> I did a portupgrade on a freebsd 8.2-RELEASE >>> of the portupgrade program itself >>> portupgrade-2.4.8_1,2< needs updating (index has 2.4.9,2) >>> (that upgraded also ruby to 1.9: >> >> I did the same on some boxes and I'm having a lot of troubles too... >> >> # pkgdb -L >> Look for lost dependencies: >> undefined method `map' for # >> > > Hi! > > Can you, please, try the portupgrade version from the ports? > It should fix those issues. Not really. I tried "portupgrade -R portupgrade", but still had a messed-up system. Since I don't use Ruby for much and had only portupgrade and libchk using it, I wiped them all and reinstalled portupgrade from scratch. This also reinstalled ruby. I'm still getting "undefined method `map'..." when I run pkgdb, however. > # pkg_info -r portupgrade\* > Information for portupgrade-2.4.9.2,2: > > Depends on: > Dependency: libyaml-0.1.4_1 > Dependency: openssl-1.0.0_5 > Dependency: pkg-config-0.25_1 > Dependency: libffi-3.0.9 > Dependency: ruby-1.9.2.290,1 > Sorry for the inconvinences! You're welcome, I appreciate your work and help. bye & Thanks av.