Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:40:43 +0200
From:      Eirik Oeverby <ltning@anduin.net>
To:        Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@withagen.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: anybody using net-snmp on AMD64 or other 64bit platforms??
Message-ID:  <40DAE7EB.7070800@anduin.net>
In-Reply-To: <010e01c45304$ed1c5c90$471b3dd4@dual>
References:  <023d01c45161$8f486360$471b3dd4@dual><40CCA3CB.6090808@anduin.net><02b001c4517d$46da25c0$471b3dd4@dual><033301c45198$ddd10b40$471b3dd4@dual> <058901c4525a$105cfbc0$471b3dd4@dual> <010e01c45304$ed1c5c90$471b3dd4@dual>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> For those really desperate to run snmpd on 64bit, there are some very crude
> patches. Most likely not for the faint of hart, but everything compiles and runs
> at my end.

I can confirm that for the limited use I have of it, it seems to work. 
Been running for a week now, no hickups.

/Eirik

> They need more work to be integrated into the port, since I have not worked out
> the int <> long <> pointer stuff. Which really creates issues here.
> 
> None the less, if you want:
>     withagen.dyndns.org:/FreeBSD/net-snmp.64bit.diff
> Tell me if it breaks.
> 
> --WjW
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Willem Jan Withagen" <wjw@withagen.nl>
> To: "Willem Jan Withagen" <wjw@withagen.nl>
> Cc: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:53 PM
> Subject: Re: anybody using net-snmp on AMD64 or other 64bit platforms??
> 
> 
> 
>>>I've got it more or less running, and snmpd is no longer crashing on me
> 
> "yet".
> 
>>>But I'm now getting wrong answers for the tcp/udp connections. But for
>>>established connections as well as open server ports....
>>>
>>>Both netstat and snmpd do this by retreiving data with sysctl from the
> 
> kernel.
> 
>>>And where netstat has got its things right, snmpd seems to be really off.
>>>The most likely reason is that snmpd defines some structures by itself, but
>>
>>now
>>
>>>the question is which part is that???
>>
>>It is now running to the part where I can do the things with it I'd like to
> 
> use
> 
>>it for....
>>Just figure out a way of putting the changes back in in such a way that it'll
>>still work on 32bit. And get the maintainer to accept my fixes...
>>
>>But as far as I could tell, certain features (udp/tcptables) did not work on
>>i386 either.
>>
>>--WjW
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40DAE7EB.7070800>