Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:47:50 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, current@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: TRUE and FALSE Message-ID: <199502222347.PAA06084@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199502222345.QAA15987@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 22, 95 04:45:52 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At what gain are we doing this? I believe it's a noble gain to have the > source tree compile w/out reference to /usr/include, but what does it > gain us? The only thing I can see where it's a big deal is building a > brand-new $(DESTDIR) tree. Other than that, most of the time I *want* > to use the files in /usr/include and NOT those in /usr/src (speaking as > a user-land kind of guy). "The only thing..." You are elected to release eng for 2.2 if you want to ... :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> TRW Financial Systems, Inc. I am Pentium Of Borg. Division is Futile. You WILL be approximated.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502222347.PAA06084>