Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 22:02:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: nnd@mail.nsk.ru Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel broken? (pcm) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910112202340.73636-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <199910120257.JAA80657@wint.itfs.nsk.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 nnd@mail.nsk.ru wrote: > > We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we > > don't need to go hunting down oddities. :> > > Does it mean that I throw away my PR with patches to > the 'newpcm' files which add 'abs' definition and therefore > make it possible to make kernel with > > makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin ? > > P.S. It seems to me that this option (or its absent) can > severely influence kernel run time efficience (not in the 'abs' > case, of course ;-). No. I was merely joking around. We welcome your patches. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910112202340.73636-100000>