From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 14 20:44:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07374C0F; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x22a.google.com (mail-vc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9DF396; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hf12so8875653vcb.15 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:44:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FPIoX2l52V4AgAjHlp/bgELlPFiZ5t7h7hbI/qJyR5Q=; b=wV0FYsUMWGu/cVTodP/H/Gt7IfIIM1ILxbVTEeEaXXUpqcar7xTSo6zoNHwLWvz0Wx 1XFWgiZ2MLHK60IyxcA1x02K6cSQIswRQmZIRzrRZ6aAzFpInjw+6OLjCjh8EzyUmEFu z1YS/U0VdhSzhu/SpPQreEMsLOt1ZoJQjWg5EdgbrRwIy72NfkJHxKftuUwHr5uJLzJU kJCqRhldKNOMW2g6kylOCt3WqvUHYoor/PMt6/rS3NC03edsDYjEuZMBrlCgEI1ThrSX QavZ0GSZnDm2bRTwDyMQP2W9yO74Lr0ttMCmwPHRIlRAl+gFPsesBnvO5KZ9/CrMoFQJ fRwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.236.199 with SMTP id uw7mr23685189vdc.18.1373834667214; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.92.196 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:44:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 22:44:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is ATH_ENABLE_11N supposed to work on 9-stable? From: Thomas Zander To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:44:28 -0000 On 14 July 2013 18:41, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Nope. It's a -10 thing. Okay, thanks for clarifying. Riggs