From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 18 13:43:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16266340; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C01F41; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (233.Red-79-156-124.staticIP.rima-tde.net [79.156.124.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE30643BE9; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:43:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <55325F8F.1070801@marino.st> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:43:43 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beich , John Marino CC: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r384218 - in head/news: husky husky-fidoconf References: <201504181028.t3IAStv4005766@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 13:43:50 -0000 On 4/18/2015 14:32, Jan Beich wrote: > John Marino writes: > >> Log: >> The fidoconf package uses texi files to build an info page and an html >> page. It appears there is no man page equivalent. I couldn't find a >> patch to fix the old-format texi files that the latest texinfo programs >> can read, so I blocked them from building on FreeBSD 11 and DragonFly >> where the port was broken. > > Would the following work? Found within a minute on $search_engine for > "raising the section level of @subsection which is too low". > I think most of these had multiple problems, not just @subsection. The other husky INFO page had unrecognized functions or something like that. The maintainer has been notified so he can figure out what the best approach is. Right now only FreeBSD 11 is even affected. John