Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:56:15 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/compat/compat4x.alpha libc.so.4.bz2.uu libc_r.so.4.bz2.uu libhistory.so.4.bz2.uu libm.so.2.bz2.uu libopie.so.2.bz2.uu libpcap.so.2.bz2.uu libperl.so.3.bz2.uu libreadline.so.4.bz2.uu Message-ID: <20041013195615.GC90229@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20041003004611E.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <200410020146.i921kKAO057981@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041002044957.GA36384@dragon.nuxi.com> <20041003004611E.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 12:46:11AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > obrien> Why did you do this?? You know that we're removing these libs in > obrien> 6-CURRENT. I discussed it with you and you bought into it. > > It would be a good decision IMHO -- can we tweak compat library > directory in near future? A sample patch attached below. .. > -ldconfig_paths="/usr/lib/compat /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib" > +ldconfig_paths="/usr/X11R6/lib /usr/local/lib" .. > - compat > - aout > - .. > - .. There is some debate about if compat libs should be placed in /usr/lib/compat or /usr/local/lib/compat. I'm not sure what way I fall on this... but I'd love to know if we have consensus among committers. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041013195615.GC90229>