From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun  8 19:58:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7B42E16A4CE; Tue,  8 Jun 2004 19:58:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2631143D39; Tue,  8 Jun 2004 19:58:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com)
Received: (from dan@localhost)
	by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i58JwpD0027730;
	Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:58:51 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from dan)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:58:50 -0500
From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Message-ID: <20040608195850.GB46338@dan.emsphone.com>
References: <1086663455.1258.79.camel@server.mcneil.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10406080028070.11500-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
	<20040608044844.GA89198@dan.emsphone.com>
	<20040608072706.GA82243@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20040608154510.GB89198@dan.emsphone.com>
	<1086717435.68846.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1086717435.68846.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT
X-message-flag: Outlook Error
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
cc: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com>
Subject: Re: weak implementation of threads has problems - kse fix attached
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:58:52 -0000

In the last episode (Jun 08), Joe Marcus Clarke said:
> If we switched PTHREAD_LIBS to -pthread, we wouldn't need this.  Shared
> objects would not have a link to libpthread, and shared objects that
> really referenced pthread symbols would still require executables to be
> linked to PTHREAD_LIBS (i.e. how it works on 4.X).

It'd still be a good sanity check for people porting libraries, I
think.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com