From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 25 22:27:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E270106568C for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f180.google.com (mail-px0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB2B8FC19 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi10 with SMTP id 10so6443336pxi.28 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H+2zIVpwRw+XNay3jAN8gYd9OstQFPD83q3/CZw/084=; b=BFhcuvsFEB4MXRZwOAxYA5N9AhZz8YB7ggCnWT9KG+bZPvozyDcRkUMDFj+levV2ck lsQd7EroyAJ2PahgsseLfYqz1Sj39IBtxKH/1YyAaZzJwdXXeK3YhbZENFA9Ga2ORdNo 3Rhs6ipkpdIVAL7wpAjTLGWR156yY2JMoo180= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RrSaF+Mx4BZ36QEDGydmXJy2gGviSEtojqpnJYvzmTSyH493+oqBAcGvzdOKw+PGqT w7yd9ls796Jw2JAAQUch1r59zkJLUYefvRUabwQOugznemHvn/LJsRT1g1vXXiLmA4XV Hrj8kTNEJ5fL36dFATWYD8dppp1YU553eqGvM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.115.116.4 with SMTP id t4mr988628wam.106.1251239223717; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:27:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A933B27.1080501@tenebras.com> References: <14889119.2221251120185215.JavaMail.root@zim.freshx.de> <4A933B27.1080501@tenebras.com> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:27:03 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 360add7dd3d8e04b Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: kudzu@tenebras.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing up the xen port - would funding help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:27:04 -0000 Ok, there's enough interest at the moment for me to dedicate some cycles again. As I said earlier, my main concern isn't getting the port up to date, its making certain that there's enough support and investment from interested parties in making sure its kept alive. Let me organise some kind of portable Xen hacking device.. Adrian 2009/8/25 Michael Sierchio : > Randy Bush wrote: >>> I've kept quiet, but I wonder why we're feeding penguins for dom0, >>> when netbsd has dom0 support since 4.0 > > For my part, I am much more concerned with getting a working domU > for i386 and amd64 than with *BSD as a dom0. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >