From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 14:46:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E8516A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:46:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from voyager.twobirds.us (c-24-18-222-18.client.comcast.net [24.18.222.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE243D2D for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:46:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joshua@twobirds.us) Received: from [12.18.154.2] (helo=localhost) by voyager.twobirds.us with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B4Sks-0005Oh-9i; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:46:18 -0800 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:46:26 -0800 From: Joshua Lokken To: Charles McManis Message-ID: <20040319224626.GA2596@cs025_2k> Mail-Followup-To: Charles McManis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040319172130.GB2044@cs025_2k> <20040319174618.GH64130@keyslapper.org> <200403191428.24150.cmcmanis@mcmanis.com> <20040319223154.GA31596@yoda.anything-inc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040319223154.GA31596@yoda.anything-inc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Organization: Little to none... cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Top posting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:46:35 -0000 * Bob Collins [2004-03-19 14:33]: > > > > It comes down to opinion I think > > --Chuck > > > > > > On Friday 19 March 2004 09:46, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > > On 03/19/04 09:21 AM, Joshua Lokken sat at the `puter and typed: > > > > > > > > RFC 1855. Please, it has been requested from many users of this > > > > list, do not top post replies, but don't stop sending them ;) > > > > > > > > > I feel your pain dude. > > > > > > Lou > > > > [format broken, see above and then back down to here] > > No, it is not logical. If everyone top-posts, the email must be read in > reverse to recapture thoughts of others or points made. If twleve people > reply properly and you reply the way your `opinion' tells you too, you > have broken the path or reading, by forcing people to jump to the bottom > to refresh the last message and then back to the top to get the latest > thoughts or info. It is also quite obnoxious to review such top-posters > threads that are intermixed when looking through the archives. > > Finally, as pointed out previously, it does not follow convention. It is > much like Microsft `enhancing' an industry standard, which actually > breaks the standard. > > -- > Bob Indeed. Chuck, I'm not saying I'm going to stop reading your posts because you don't want to follow convention/etiquette, but it appears that the community at large does not feel the way you do. -- Joshua In the strict scientific sense we all feed on death -- even vegetarians. -- Spock, "Wolf in the Fold", stardate 3615.4