Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:40:10 -0700
From:      David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ?
Message-ID:  <8bfbda9f-79b9-5e45-7c00-de32da3f14ed@holgerdanske.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org>
References:  <CALMiprbGBaSJQUAA=1HDZAjvsVNK7dqB_5mBb5DKzV16F3hxHg@mail.gmail.com> <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 2020-10-24 03:10, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:51:25 -0700
> TheBigBlue Guard <thebigblueguard@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes ...everyone...What is the "better /best and least expensive "
> 
> 	A [boot] swap drive bay is the most foolproof and reliable method that
> ensures no OS no matter how buggy or misguided can mess up another.


Boot drive swap bay -- minimum effort, maximum reliability, and maximum 
expense.  This is what I do.


Multi-boot -- maximum effort, minimum reliability, and minimum expense.


David



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8bfbda9f-79b9-5e45-7c00-de32da3f14ed>