Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:40:10 -0700 From: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the "better / best " method to multi-boot different OSes natively WITHOUT VirtualBox(es) ? Message-ID: <8bfbda9f-79b9-5e45-7c00-de32da3f14ed@holgerdanske.com> In-Reply-To: <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org> References: <CALMiprbGBaSJQUAA=1HDZAjvsVNK7dqB_5mBb5DKzV16F3hxHg@mail.gmail.com> <20201024111010.5c867e8540a369b826d26703@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-10-24 03:10, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 02:51:25 -0700 > TheBigBlue Guard <thebigblueguard@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes ...everyone...What is the "better /best and least expensive " > > A [boot] swap drive bay is the most foolproof and reliable method that > ensures no OS no matter how buggy or misguided can mess up another. Boot drive swap bay -- minimum effort, maximum reliability, and maximum expense. This is what I do. Multi-boot -- maximum effort, minimum reliability, and minimum expense. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8bfbda9f-79b9-5e45-7c00-de32da3f14ed>