Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:53:23 -0800
From:      Eric Melville <emelville@anomali.com>
To:        Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>
Cc:        Eric Melville <emelville@anomali.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: bhyve centos7
Message-ID:  <953E1B6E-3FD4-471A-9751-FB07D48AF8B7@anomali.com>
In-Reply-To: <185aadb4-1646-4a4d-23e2-3f7867e7920e@passap.ru>
References:  <E07B4FC6-7466-4017-AD65-F6FFE9F7E84F@anomali.com> <119f89a2-1c35-036b-1398-1700a3bdd696@passap.ru> <C86D1DF6-1D6B-4EEA-9873-6ECB994D0D41@anomali.com> <185aadb4-1646-4a4d-23e2-3f7867e7920e@passap.ru>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> I installed directly CentOS-7.1 (CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1503-01.iso).
> I tried the newest version with CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1611.iso and
> it really failed to load saying "not a correct XFS inode". I rechecked
> and CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1503-01.iso works fine.

Thanks, this is exactly what I needed. It looked like 1611 was the only =
Centos7 available for download. After finally finding a 1503 copy I was =
able to install and update to 1611.

> vm-bhyve is just shell scripts for bhyve, it does not add any
> functionality. However it make life more comfortable. ;-)

Sure, but the right combination of operations will make it work and that =
combination may have been more apparent via vm-bhyve. I still think that =
installing 1611 to ext4 would avoid the XFS problem, bewildered that =
Centos does not offer any partitioning options via command line install.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?953E1B6E-3FD4-471A-9751-FB07D48AF8B7>