Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 16:10:27 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import Message-ID: <20040703231027.GA74329@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <xzphdsorgjx.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <200407020815.i628F5sp016504@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040702100347.GA9202@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpd63eipfx.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040702161947.GI779@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpk6xms6ve.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040702215054.GA54100@xor.obsecurity.org> <xzphdsorgjx.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:17:54PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: > > It's a bit disingenuous to criticize someone for not building with -O2 > > and then noting in the next email that there's a known bug with -O2. >=20 > No, it isn't. The bug is there because we've been shoving that kind > of thing under the carpet for years, and the best way to stop doing > that is to make -O2 mandatory for developers. Then either make -O2 mandatory for developers by putting it in make.conf, or don't complain that developers aren't building with your private special settings. Kris --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5zziWry0BWjoQKURAvnvAJ9gt9V3otZGLUARWydDb9YhHpU4XACdFvFO 6HEeh+f6R83K2hGuR6uEUyU= =UGFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040703231027.GA74329>