From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 16 01:50:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1811491D for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 01:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05F871886 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 01:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s3G1o2ka016086 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 01:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s3G1o2Bf016085; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 01:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 01:50:02 GMT Message-Id: <201404160150.s3G1o2Bf016085@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jia-Shiun Li Subject: Re: ports/188640: [patch] x11-servers/xorg-server is make jobs safe X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jia-Shiun Li List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 01:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/188640; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jia-Shiun Li To: Niclas Zeising Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/188640: [patch] x11-servers/xorg-server is make jobs safe Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:47:59 +0800 Hi Niclas, this is not a bug thus no error. It is an attempt to mark this ports as jobs-safe. There was no error in my test and it indeed sped up compilation. If no other concerns, this can make port build faster. Regards, On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > Can you please provide the actual error? > Regards! > -- > Niclas Zeising