Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:07:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile cached.conf src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile cached src/include nsswitch.h src/include/rpc rpcent.h src/lib/libc Makefile src/lib/libc/gen getgrent.c getpwent.c src/lib/libc/include nscache.h nscachedcli.h ... Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604291105080.10119@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <ygeu08ch1dc.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <200604281203.k3SC3da7070033@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604291031220.10119@sea.ntplx.net> <ygeu08ch1dc.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:39:47 -0400 (EDT) >>>>>> Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> said: > > deischen> Great work, but is there a reason why this is called cached instead > deischen> of nscd? There is prior precedent (Linux, Solaris) for nscd and > deischen> nscd.conf, and cached is just too general. > > cached(8) doesn't do actuall lookup like nscd(8) does, basically. So, > I feel awkward to call cached(8) nscd(8). However, it might be too > general as you say. Well, what is the difference between Linux/Solaris nscd and cached? Is there a reason why we don't want the daemons to be functionally equivalent? -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0604291105080.10119>