From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 11:11:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783331065693 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FCE8FC1B for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6NBBv4Q008711; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:11:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q6NBBuHi008708; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:11:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:11:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jakub Lach In-Reply-To: <1343040957437-5729157.post@n5.nabble.com> Message-ID: References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> <1343037776471-5729143.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120723064850.59451f74@scorpio> <1343040957437-5729157.post@n5.nabble.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:11:57 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:11:58 -0000 > Format without partition table? yes. Windows recognizes it properly except Win98/95 (which doesn't work with large USB drives anyway).