Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 18:31:38 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Thomas Stephens <tas@stephens.org> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: support for larger memory Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990331183105.20663T-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199904010212.DAA39218@stephens.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
One presumes that the BSDI binaries fail without the diff? :-) julian On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Thomas Stephens wrote: > John Polstra wrote: > >In article <199903302319.PAA43671@apollo.backplane.com>, > >Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> wrote: > >> > >> Has anyone tried implementing the %ebx solution yet? > > > >Not as far as I know. I was hoping that somebody who cared about > >BSD/OS compatibility would pick up the description of the fix, test > >it, and submit diffs. No takers, so far. :-( > > I'll bite. I tried your fix this morning, and it's worked without a > problem so far. I've just upgraded the world (had only built a kernel > earlier), and haven't done any rigorous testing, but it looks good. I > use the AT&T ksh for BSD/OS as my standard shell, which should be a > reasonable test, but haven't got access to BSD/OS itself, so don't have > much to test beyond the AT&T tools. > > Unless something goes wrong, I'll probably submit the diffs within the > next day or so. > > Thomas Stephens > tas@stephens.org > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.990331183105.20663T-100000>