From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 25 03:55:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0615516A420 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:55:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (c-67-168-241-176.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.241.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B4543D45 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:55:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1P3ttDP029328 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:55:55 -0800 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id k1P3ttFt029325 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:55:55 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id DAA25880; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:55:55 GMT Message-Id: <200602250355.DAA25880@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:55:55 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Bug in newfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:55:57 -0000 FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 newfs -N -b 65536 -f 8192 -i 262144 -m 0 -o space -s 2295104 -S 2048 /dev/ad10s1 /dev/ad10s1: 4482.6MB (9180416 sectors) block size 65536, fragment size 8192 using 4 cylinder groups of 1120.69MB, 17931 blks, 4608 inodes. super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at: 256, 2295424, 4590592, 6885760 2295104 * 2048 = 4700372992 bytes in filesystem. 17931 blocks * 65536 bytes/block = 1175126016 bytes 1175126016 * 4 cylinder groups = 4700504064 bytes 4700504064 > 4700372992 so it will not fit Does "17931 blks" include the inodes, superblocks, etc.? If not, it doesn't fit even worse. ======== Any reason that "-a 71724" shouldn't work? Any reason that "-e 17931" shouldn't work? Goal is to create a filesystem that can be written to a DVD+RW without the 2GB per file limit of ISO-9660.